Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Nomoloģiskā validitāte× | Diskriminantā validitāte× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Psihometrija | Psihometrija |
| Saime | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1955 | 1959 |
| Autors≠ | Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl | Donald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske |
| Tips≠ | Validity evidence framework | Validity evidence / psychometric evaluation |
| Pirmavots≠ | Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | nomological network validity, construct network validity, nomological web validity | discriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity |
| Saistītās≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Nomological validity evaluates whether a construct behaves as theory predicts within a broader network of related constructs. It is not a single statistical test but an accumulation of evidence that the measure fits coherently into a web of theoretically grounded relationships — demonstrating that what is measured is what the theory says it should measure. | Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|