ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Tehnika "Nominal Group Technique" (NGT)×Darbības izpēte×Delphi metode×Fokusgrupu izpēte×
NozareKvalitatīvās metodesKvalitatīvie pētījumiKvalitatīvās metodesKvalitatīvās metodes
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads1971194619631940s (sociological origin); modern applied form from the 1980s–1990s
AutorsAndré L. Delbecq and Andrew H. Van de VenKurt Lewin; expanded by Kemmis, McTaggart, Reason & BradburyNorman Dalkey & Olaf Helmer (RAND Corporation)Robert K. Merton (sociological precursor, 1940s); popularised in applied research by Richard A. Krueger
TipsQualitative research methodMethodStructured iterative expert-elicitation processQualitative data collection method
PirmavotsDelbecq, A. L., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1971). A group process model for problem identification and program planning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 7(4), 466–492. link ↗Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. DOI ↗Dalkey, N. & Helmer, O. (1963). An Experimental Application of the Delphi Method to the Use of Experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458-467. DOI ↗Krueger, R.A. & Casey, M.A. (2014). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (5th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483365244
Citi nosaukumiNGT, structured group process, nominal group process, priority-setting group methodParticipatory Action Research, PAR, Collaborative InquiryDelphi Yöntemi, Delphi technique, expert consensus methodfocus group discussion, FGD, group interview, Odak Grup Araştırması
Saistītās6156
KopsavilkumsThe Nominal Group Technique (NGT) is a structured group facilitation method designed to generate and prioritise ideas, problems, or solutions while ensuring equal participation from all members. Developed by Delbecq and Van de Ven in 1971, it combines silent individual idea generation with structured group discussion and systematic voting to produce a ranked list of priorities. Unlike unstructured focus groups, NGT prevents dominant voices from suppressing quieter participants, making it especially valuable for needs assessment, program planning, and stakeholder priority-setting in applied research and policy contexts.Action research is a collaborative research methodology in which researchers work with practitioners and community members to investigate a problem, implement change, and evaluate outcomes, cycling through reflection, action, and learning. Developed by Kurt Lewin (1946), action research bridges research and practice, aiming simultaneously to produce knowledge and practical improvement.The Delphi method is a structured, iterative survey technique developed by Norman Dalkey and Olaf Helmer at the RAND Corporation in 1963 for eliciting and converging expert opinion on complex topics where empirical data are unavailable or insufficient. It collects independent judgements from a geographically dispersed expert panel over multiple anonymous rounds, feeding aggregated results back to participants after each round so they can revise their views in light of the group's collective position.Focus group research is a qualitative data-collection method in which a trained moderator guides structured discussions with homogeneous groups of six to ten participants to explore ideas, attitudes, and perceptions on a defined topic. Developed from sociological roots in the 1940s and systematised for applied research by Krueger and Casey, the method leverages group interaction as a data source — revealing not just what people think, but how they negotiate and articulate views in a social setting.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Nominal Group Technique · Action Research · Delphi Method · Focus Group. Izgūts 2026-06-18 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare