ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Jauna metodes objektīvu kritēriju svaru noteikšanai×Kombinētais kompromisa risinājums×
NozareLēmumu pieņemšanaLēmumu pieņemšana
SaimeMCDMMCDM
Izcelsmes gads20172019
AutorsBulut, E.Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
TipsWeight_Objective (normalised matrix column-mean based)Aggregated exponential comparison (WSM + WPM combination)
PirmavotsBulut, E. (2017). A comparative analysis of the criteria weights determination methods for selection of ship propulsion system. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment link ↗Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2019). A combined compromise solution (COCOSO) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems. Management Decision DOI ↗
Citi nosaukumi
Saistītās88
KopsavilkumsNMD (New Method of Determining objective criterion weights) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bulut, E. in 2017. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.COCOSO (Combined Compromise Solution) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 1 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: NMD · COCOSO. Izgūts 2026-06-18 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare