ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Jauna metodes objektīvu kritēriju svaru noteikšanai×AROMAN×
NozareLēmumu pieņemšanaLēmumu pieņemšana
SaimeMCDMMCDM
Izcelsmes gads20172022
AutorsBulut, E.Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M.
TipsWeight_Objective (normalised matrix column-mean based)Two-step normalisation (linear + vector) with weighted power aggregation
PirmavotsBulut, E. (2017). A comparative analysis of the criteria weights determination methods for selection of ship propulsion system. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment link ↗Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. (2022). AROMAN — Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering link ↗
Citi nosaukumi
Saistītās88
KopsavilkumsNMD (New Method of Determining objective criterion weights) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bulut, E. in 2017. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.AROMAN (Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. in 2022. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 1 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: NMD · AROMAN. Izgūts 2026-06-18 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare