Salīdzināt metodes

	Ņūkaslas-Otawas skala novērojumu pētījumu kvalitātes novērtēšanai	PRISMA kontrolsaraksts: Sistemātisko pārskatu un metaanalīžu ziņošanas standarti
Nozare	Pētniecības metodoloģija	Pētniecības metodoloģija
Saime	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads	2000	2021 (original 2009)
Autors	Wells et al. (Ottawa Hospital Research Institute)	Page et al. (PRISMA Group)
Tips	Research team assessment	Systematic review author reporting checklist
Pirmavots	Wells, G. A., Shea, B., O'Connell, D., Peterson, J., Welch, V., Losos, M., & Tugwell, P. (2000). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Retrieved from Ottawa Hospital Research Institute.	Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71.
Citi nosaukumi	NOS	PRISMA, PRISMA 2020
Saistītās	4	4
Kopsavilkums	The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) is a widely used tool for assessing the methodological quality of observational studies (case-control and cohort designs) included in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Developed by Wells et al. at Ottawa Hospital in 2000, it provides explicit criteria and a star-based scoring system that enables transparent, quantitative comparison of study quality across evidence syntheses.	PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) is a 27-item evidence-based checklist published in 2021 (updated from 2009) to standardize reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Endorsed by over 500 journals, PRISMA is the international standard for evidence synthesis reporting, used across healthcare, psychology, education, and social sciences to ensure transparency and reproducibility.