Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Net-Map (Influence Network Mapping)× | Cultural Domain Analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Anthropology | Anthropology |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2010 | 1994 |
| Autors≠ | Eva Schiffer (with Jennifer Hauck) | Stephen P. Borgatti (synthesis of cognitive anthropology methods) |
| Tips≠ | Participatory tool for collecting social/influence network data and facilitating learning | Integrated framework for eliciting and analyzing cultural domains |
| Pirmavots≠ | Schiffer, E., & Hauck, J. (2010). Net-Map: collecting social network data and facilitating network learning through participatory influence network mapping. Field Methods, 22(3), 231–249. DOI ↗ | Borgatti, S. P. (1994). Cultural domain analysis. Journal of Quantitative Anthropology, 4(4), 261–278. link ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | Net-Map, Influence Network Mapping, Participatory Influence Mapping, Influence Tower Mapping | CDA, Domain Analysis (cognitive anthropology), Cultural Domains Approach, Cognitive Domain Analysis |
| Saistītās≠ | 3 | 4 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Net-Map is a participatory, paper-based tool developed by Eva Schiffer for collecting social and influence network data while helping participants reflect on the networks they are part of. Sitting around a large sheet, participants name the actors involved in a goal or process, draw and label the links between them by type (for example funding, information, or command), and then stack physical 'influence towers' — disks or blocks — beside each actor to show how much power that actor holds. The session produces both a rich qualitative discussion and a quantitative, analyzable network with weighted nodes and typed, directed ties. | Cultural domain analysis is the integrated framework in cognitive anthropology for discovering the content and structure of a cultural domain — a coherent set of related items such as illnesses, animals, kin terms, or emotions — as the members of a culture themselves organize it. It chains together elicitation methods (free listing, pile sorting, triad tests) and analytic methods (salience, multidimensional scaling, clustering, consensus analysis) to move from 'what items are in this domain?' to 'how are they organized and how widely is that organization shared?' |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|