Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Narativā analīze× | Tematiskā analīze× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare≠ | Kvalitatīvās metodes | Kvalitatīvie pētījumi |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1967 (foundational); 2008 (canonical handbook) | 2006 |
| Autors≠ | Catherine Kohler Riessman (seminal synthesis, 2008); roots in Labov & Waletzky (1967) | Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke |
| Tips≠ | Qualitative interpretive method | Method |
| Pirmavots≠ | Riessman, C.K. (2008). Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. Sage. link ↗ | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | narrative inquiry, life history analysis, biographical research, Anlatı Analizi (Narrative Analysis) | TA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis |
| Saistītās≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Narrative analysis is a qualitative research method, synthesised canonically by Catherine Kohler Riessman (2008), that examines how individuals storise their lived experiences and construct meaning through the telling. Drawing on life history, biographical, and narrative inquiry traditions, it treats the story itself — not just its content — as the unit of analysis, attending to temporal sequence, plot structure, and the social context in which a narrative is produced. | Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|