Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Mūzikas terapijas novērtēšanas rīks× | Attitudes toward Complementary and Alternative Medicine Scale× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Integratīvā medicīna | Integratīvā medicīna |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2008 | 2003 |
| Autors≠ | Hanson, B.; Clark, M.; Plante, W. | Hough, H. J.; Darcey, V. L.; Scofield, R. F. |
| Tips≠ | Multi-method: client self-report, clinician observation, behavioral coding | Self-report scale |
| Pirmavots≠ | Thaut, M. H. (2005). Rhythm, music, and the brain: Scientific foundations and clinical applications. New York: Routledge. link ↗ | Hough, H. J., Darcey, V. L., & Scofield, R. F. (2003). Attitudes toward alternative/complementary medicines among pharmacy students, faculty, and preceptors. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 67(3), 85. link ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | MTAT, Music Therapy Outcome Measures | ACAMS |
| Saistītās | 4 | 4 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | The MTAT is a comprehensive assessment instrument for measuring client outcomes and music therapist competency in music therapy. Developed by Hanson and colleagues, it operationalizes music therapy impact across emotional, social, behavioral, and physiological domains, suitable for diverse populations including psychiatric, pediatric, geriatric, and neurological populations. | The ACAMS is a self-report instrument measuring healthcare professionals' and students' attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine. Developed in the early 2000s, it assesses openness, acceptance, and perceived legitimacy of CAM alongside conventional medicine, helping identify educational gaps and organizational readiness for integrative practice. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|