Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Daudzveidīga gadījumizpētes refleksīvā tēmatiskā analīze× | Tematiskā analīze× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare≠ | Kvalitatīvās metodes | Kvalitatīvie pētījumi |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2006 (RTA origins); 2010s onward (combined application) | 2006 |
| Autors≠ | Braun & Clarke (reflexive thematic analysis); Yin (multiple case study framework) | Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke |
| Tips≠ | Qualitative research design and analysis approach | Method |
| Pirmavots≠ | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. Sage. ISBN: 978-1473953246 | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | MC-RTA, multi-case reflexive thematic analysis, cross-case reflexive thematic analysis, multiple case RTA | TA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis |
| Saistītās≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Multiple case-based reflexive thematic analysis integrates Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis (RTA) with a multiple case study framework. Qualitative data are collected from two or more bounded cases, RTA is applied within each case to generate case-specific themes, and the themes are then compared and synthesised across cases. The approach preserves the depth and interpretive richness of RTA while enabling cross-case pattern recognition that single-case designs cannot provide. | Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|