Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Multiple case-based institutional ethnography× | Salīdzināmā etnografija× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Kvalitatīvās metodes | Kvalitatīvās metodes |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1987 (IE foundation); multi-case application developed through 1990s–2000s | 1987–1995 (systematic comparative ethnography formalized) |
| Autors≠ | Dorothy E. Smith (institutional ethnography); multi-site adaptation by IE practitioners | George E. Marcus (multi-sited formulation); Charles C. Ragin (comparative logic) |
| Tips≠ | Qualitative multi-site research design | Qualitative comparative research design |
| Pirmavots≠ | Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. AltaMira Press. ISBN: 978-0759105690 | Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | multi-site institutional ethnography, comparative institutional ethnography, multi-case IE, multiple-site IE | multi-sited ethnography, cross-site ethnography, comparative field research, comparative participant observation |
| Saistītās | 6 | 6 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Multiple case-based institutional ethnography combines Dorothy E. Smith's institutional ethnography with a multi-site case structure, enabling researchers to trace how the same ruling relations, texts, and institutional processes operate across two or more distinct organizational or community settings. By holding the analytical framework constant while varying the site, this design reveals both the trans-local reach of ruling apparatus and the locally specific ways people navigate institutional coordination. | Comparative ethnography is a qualitative research design that conducts in-depth ethnographic fieldwork across two or more sites, groups, communities, or cultural settings in order to generate systematic comparisons. Rather than describing a single community in isolation, it traces similarities, differences, and interconnections across cases, producing theoretically grounded insights that no single site could yield alone. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|