ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Daudzpusēju gadījumu digitālā etnogrāfija×Daudzpusīgā gadījumu izpēte×
NozareKvalitatīvās metodesKvalitatīvās metodes
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads2000s–2010s1980s–1990s (Yin's first edition 1984; Stake's collective case study concept 1995)
AutorsChristine Hine (virtual ethnography); Sarah Pink et al. (digital ethnography); cross-case logic from Robert YinRobert K. Yin (systematic replication logic); Robert E. Stake (naturalistic/collective case tradition)
TipsQualitative comparative research designQualitative research method
PirmavotsHine, C. (2000). Virtual Ethnography. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761958956Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169
Citi nosaukumimulti-case digital ethnography, comparative digital ethnography, cross-case digital ethnography, multi-site digital ethnographycomparative case study, multi-site case study, collective case study, cross-case analysis
Saistītās56
KopsavilkumsMultiple case-based digital ethnography is a qualitative research design that conducts ethnographic fieldwork across two or more purposefully selected digital sites or communities, then systematically compares findings across cases. Rooted in digital ethnography's immersive, interpretive tradition and in multiple case study logic, it reveals both site-specific practices and cross-cutting patterns in online social life. It is especially suited to questions about how similar phenomena are enacted differently across digital platforms, communities, or cultural contexts.Multiple-case study design investigates two or more bounded real-world cases using the same research protocol, then compares findings across cases to identify patterns, contrasts, and explanatory insights that a single case could not produce. Developed primarily through Robert Yin's replication logic and Robert Stake's collective case tradition, the approach is particularly powerful when a researcher needs to determine whether a phenomenon occurs under varied conditions or to test an emerging theoretical explanation against rival contexts.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Multiple case-based digital ethnography · Multiple-Case Study. Izgūts 2026-06-15 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare