ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Vairāku gadījumu autoetnogrāfija×Daudzpusīgā gadījumu izpēte×
NozareKvalitatīvās metodesKvalitatīvās metodes
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads2000s–2010s1980s–1990s (Yin's first edition 1984; Stake's collective case study concept 1995)
AutorsHeewon Chang, Faith Ngunjiri, Kathy-Ann Hernandez (collaborative autoethnography); broader tradition from Carolyn Ellis and Arthur BochnerRobert K. Yin (systematic replication logic); Robert E. Stake (naturalistic/collective case tradition)
TipsQualitative research design variantQualitative research method
PirmavotsChang, H., Ngunjiri, F. W., & Hernandez, K. A. C. (2013). Collaborative Autoethnography. Left Coast Press. ISBN: 978-1611321104Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169
Citi nosaukumicollective autoethnography, multi-case autoethnography, collaborative autoethnography, multi-site autoethnographycomparative case study, multi-site case study, collective case study, cross-case analysis
Saistītās46
KopsavilkumsMultiple case-based autoethnography is a qualitative design that extends autoethnographic inquiry across two or more researcher-participants or cases, enabling systematic comparison of personal lived experiences within a shared cultural or social phenomenon. By generating rich first-person narratives from each case and then conducting a structured cross-case analysis, the approach combines the depth and reflexivity of autoethnography with the comparative analytical power of multiple case design.Multiple-case study design investigates two or more bounded real-world cases using the same research protocol, then compares findings across cases to identify patterns, contrasts, and explanatory insights that a single case could not produce. Developed primarily through Robert Yin's replication logic and Robert Stake's collective case tradition, the approach is particularly powerful when a researcher needs to determine whether a phenomenon occurs under varied conditions or to test an emerging theoretical explanation against rival contexts.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Multiple case-based autoethnography · Multiple-Case Study. Izgūts 2026-06-15 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare