Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Vairāku gadījumu autoetnogrāfija× | Salīdzināmā autoetnogrāfija× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Kvalitatīvās metodes | Kvalitatīvās metodes |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2000s–2010s | 1979 (autoethnography); comparative application formalized ~2013 |
| Autors≠ | Heewon Chang, Faith Ngunjiri, Kathy-Ann Hernandez (collaborative autoethnography); broader tradition from Carolyn Ellis and Arthur Bochner | Hayano (term); developed further by Ellis, Bochner, Chang, Ngunjiri & Hernandez |
| Tips≠ | Qualitative research design variant | Qualitative research design |
| Pirmavots≠ | Chang, H., Ngunjiri, F. W., & Hernandez, K. A. C. (2013). Collaborative Autoethnography. Left Coast Press. ISBN: 978-1611321104 | Chang, H., Ngunjiri, F. W., & Hernandez, K.-A. C. (2013). Collaborative Autoethnography. Left Coast Press. ISBN: 978-1598745948 |
| Citi nosaukumi | collective autoethnography, multi-case autoethnography, collaborative autoethnography, multi-site autoethnography | collaborative autoethnography, multi-sited autoethnography, cross-cultural autoethnography, CAE |
| Saistītās≠ | 4 | 6 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Multiple case-based autoethnography is a qualitative design that extends autoethnographic inquiry across two or more researcher-participants or cases, enabling systematic comparison of personal lived experiences within a shared cultural or social phenomenon. By generating rich first-person narratives from each case and then conducting a structured cross-case analysis, the approach combines the depth and reflexivity of autoethnography with the comparative analytical power of multiple case design. | Comparative autoethnography is a qualitative design in which two or more researchers — or research participants — independently produce first-person self-narratives about a shared phenomenon and then systematically compare those accounts to generate broader cultural insight. By juxtaposing lived experiences that differ by context, identity, or setting, the approach moves beyond the single-voice limitations of traditional autoethnography while retaining its hallmark reflexivity and personal depth. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|