ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Multidimensional Unfolding×Ideal Point Estimation×
NozarePolitical SciencePolitical Science
SaimeLatent structureLatent structure
Izcelsmes gads20002004
AutorsKeith T. Poole (nonparametric optimal classification and unfolding)Clinton, Jackman & Rivers (Bayesian formulation); Poole & Rosenthal (spatial tradition)
TipsLatent-space scaling model placing individuals and stimuli in a joint spaceLatent-variable spatial model of binary choice data
PirmavotsPoole, K. T. (2000). Nonparametric Unfolding of Binary Choice Data. Political Analysis, 8(3), 211–237. DOI ↗Clinton, J., Jackman, S., & Rivers, D. (2004). The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data. American Political Science Review, 98(2), 355–370. DOI ↗
Citi nosaukumiUnfolding analysis, Optimal classification, Preference unfolding, Joint-space scalingIdeal point model, Item response theory for roll calls, Spatial voting model, Bayesian ideal points
Saistītās54
KopsavilkumsMultidimensional unfolding places both individuals and the stimuli they evaluate — candidates, parties, bills — in a single joint low-dimensional space, so that each person's preferences are explained by their proximity to the stimuli. In political science it underlies Keith Poole's nonparametric optimal classification of roll-call votes and the unfolding of thermometer ratings and rank orders, recovering legislators' and bills' positions from nothing but the pattern of choices. Unlike correlation-based scaling, unfolding treats preference as a single-peaked function of distance: you like what is close to you and dislike what is far.Ideal point estimation recovers the latent policy positions — ideal points — of political actors from their observed binary choices, most often legislators' yea/nay votes on roll calls. Building on the spatial theory of voting and formalized as a Bayesian item-response model by Clinton, Jackman, and Rivers in 2004, it places each legislator and each bill in a low-dimensional policy space and estimates positions so that the probability a legislator votes yea increases as the bill's 'yea' outcome moves closer to that legislator's ideal point.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Multidimensional Unfolding · Ideal Point Estimation. Izgūts 2026-06-24 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare