ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Daudscentru randomizēts klīniskais pētījums×Meta-analītisks randomizēts klīniskais pētījums×
NozareEpidemioloģijaEpidemioloģija
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads1970s–1980s (widespread adoption for large-scale efficacy trials)1976 (Glass coinage of meta-analysis); 1993 (Cochrane Collaboration formalization)
AutorsEvolved from single-center RCT methodology; consolidated through landmark trials such as the MRC streptomycin trial (1948) and large cardiovascular mega-trials of the 1970s–1980sGene V. Glass (meta-analysis method); Cochrane Collaboration (systematic RCT pooling standards)
TipsInterventional experimental designQuantitative evidence-synthesis design
PirmavotsFriedman, L. M., Furberg, C. D., DeMets, D. L., Reboussin, D. M., & Granger, C. B. (2015). Fundamentals of Clinical Trials (5th ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-3319185385Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN: 978-1119536628
Citi nosaukumimulti-site RCT, multicenter RCT, multinational randomized trial, multicenter controlled trialmeta-analytic RCT, MA-RCT, meta-analysis of RCTs, pooled randomized trial analysis
Saistītās63
KopsavilkumsA multicenter randomized clinical trial (RCT) is an experimental study in which eligible participants are randomly assigned to intervention or control arms simultaneously across two or more clinical sites. By combining the rigor of randomization with enrollment from geographically or institutionally diverse centers, this design produces large samples and externally valid effect estimates that single-center trials rarely achieve. It is the regulatory gold standard for confirmatory efficacy and safety evaluation of new treatments.A meta-analytic randomized clinical trial is a formal evidence-synthesis method that identifies, appraises, and statistically combines the results of multiple randomized clinical trials addressing the same clinical question. By pooling trial-level data, it produces a single, more precise estimate of treatment effect and quantifies between-trial heterogeneity, sitting at the apex of the evidence hierarchy for evaluating healthcare interventions.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial · Meta-analytic Randomized Clinical Trial. Izgūts 2026-06-19 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare