Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Daudzgrupu satura validitāte× | Mēroga izstrāde× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Psihometrija | Psihometrija |
| Saime | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1986–2006 | 1991–1995 |
| Autors≠ | Lynn (1986); extended by Polit & Beck (2006) | Multiple contributors; codified by Robert DeVellis and Lee Anna Clark & David Watson |
| Tips≠ | Validity assessment / expert judgment aggregation | Multi-step methodological framework |
| Pirmavots≠ | Polit, D. F. & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497. DOI ↗ | DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale Development: Theory and Applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1506341569 |
| Citi nosaukumi | multi-group CVI, cross-group content validity, subgroup content validity index, multi-panel content validity | questionnaire construction, instrument development, measurement scale construction, psychometric scale building |
| Saistītās≠ | 4 | 5 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Multi-group content validity extends the standard content validity index (CVI) procedure by computing and comparing item- and scale-level validity indices across two or more distinct expert panels or subgroups. It ensures that a scale's items are judged as relevant and representative not only overall but also within each subgroup of interest, supporting cross-group generalizability of the instrument. | Scale development is a structured, multi-step process for creating psychometrically sound measurement instruments that capture latent psychological constructs. It encompasses construct definition, item generation, expert review, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, reliability estimation, and validity evidence collection — producing a final set of items suitable for quantitative research. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|