Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Novērtēšanas vienādošana (Matching Estimator)× | Apgrieztā varbūtības svēršana (IPW / IPTW)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Cēloņsakarību secināšana | Cēloņsakarību secināšana |
| Saime | Regression model | Regression model |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1973 | 2000 |
| Autors≠ | Rubin (1973); large-sample theory by Abadie & Imbens (2006) | Robins, Hernán & Brumback |
| Tips≠ | Nonparametric matching / causal inference | Causal inference weighting estimator |
| Pirmavots≠ | Abadie, A., & Imbens, G. W. (2006). Large Sample Properties of Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects. Econometrica, 74(1), 235-267. DOI ↗ | Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | nearest-neighbor matching, NNM, matching on covariates, covariate matching | IPW, IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting, marginal structural model weighting |
| Saistītās≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | The matching estimator identifies the causal effect of a treatment by pairing each treated unit with one or more untreated units that have similar observed characteristics. Formalised by Rubin (1973) and given rigorous large-sample theory by Abadie and Imbens (2006), it constructs a credible control group from observational data without requiring a parametric model for the outcome. | Inverse Probability Weighting is a causal-inference method that assigns each observation a weight equal to the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received. Introduced by Robins, Hernán and Brumback (2000) for marginal structural models, it builds a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of measured confounders, balancing selection bias. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|