Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Epidemioloģisks pārskata pētījums ar saskaņošanu× | Matched Cohort Study× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Epidemioloģija | Epidemioloģija |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | Mid-to-late 20th century (formalized ~1970s–1990s) | Mid-20th century; propensity-score variant 1983 |
| Autors≠ | Developed within the tradition of observational epidemiology; matching principles codified by Greenland, Rothman, and Kelsey in modern epidemiology texts | Established practice; propensity-score matching formalized by Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983) |
| Tips≠ | Observational epidemiological study design | Observational analytic study design |
| Pirmavots | Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641 | Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641 |
| Citi nosaukumi | matched cross-sectional survey, matched prevalence study, matched cross-sectional design, frequency-matched cross-sectional study | matched follow-up study, paired cohort study, propensity-matched cohort, matched prospective study |
| Saistītās | 5 | 5 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | A matched cross-sectional epidemiological study is an observational design that measures exposure and outcome simultaneously in a population sample while applying matching to control for one or more confounding variables. By pairing or grouping participants on key characteristics such as age, sex, or socioeconomic status before or during analysis, the design reduces confounding bias without requiring longitudinal follow-up, making it efficient for estimating prevalence and cross-sectional associations. | A matched cohort study is an observational design in which each exposed participant is paired with one or more unexposed counterparts who share key characteristics — such as age, sex, or comorbidity status — before both groups are followed forward in time to compare incident outcomes. Matching controls for measured confounders at the design stage, reducing bias that would otherwise require statistical adjustment alone. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|