ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Salīdzinošā analīze ideālajai un reālajai situācijai ar vairākiem atribūtiem×Analytic Hierarchy Process×Analytic Network Process (ANP ar atgriezenisko saiti un savstarpēju atkarību)×Labākā-Sliktākā metode×Bayesian BWM×
NozareLēmumu pieņemšanaLēmumu pieņemšanaLēmumu pieņemšanaLēmumu pieņemšanaLēmumu pieņemšana
SaimeMCDMMCDMMCDMMCDMMCDM
Izcelsmes gads20141980199620152020
AutorsPamučar, D., Vasin, Lj., Lukovac, V.Saaty, T. L.Saaty, T. L.Rezaei, J.Mohammadi, M., Rezaei, J.
TipsGap matrix (theoretical vs actual preference)Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue)Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure)Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LPHierarchical Dirichlet posterior over weights via MCMC (JAGS) — group decision
PirmavotsPamučar, D., Vasin, Lj., Lukovac, V. (2014). Selection of railway level crossings for investing in security equipment using hybrid DEMATEL-MARICA model. XVI International Scientific-Expert Conference on Railway, Railcon link ↗Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗Mohammadi, M., Rezaei, J. (2020). Bayesian best-worst method: A probabilistic group decision making model. Omega DOI ↗
Citi nosaukumi
Saistītās88888
KopsavilkumsMAIRCA (Multi-Attributive Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Pamučar, D., Vasin, Lj., Lukovac, V. in 2014. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.BWM-BAYESIAN (Bayesian BWM — Probabilistic Group Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Mohammadi, M., Rezaei, J. in 2020. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 1 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: MAIRCA · AHP · ANP · BWM · BWM-BAYESIAN. Izgūts 2026-06-19 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare