Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Longitudinālā nomoloģiskā validitāte× | Garumskaalu mērījumu nemainības testēšana× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Psihometrija | Psihometrija |
| Saime | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1955 (concept); longitudinal extension 1990s–2000s | 1993 |
| Autors≠ | Cronbach & Meehl (nomological network concept, 1955); longitudinal extension developed in organizational and personality research from the 1990s onward | William Meredith |
| Tips≠ | Validity evaluation | Measurement model testing |
| Pirmavots≠ | Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ | Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525–543. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | longitudinal construct validity, nomological network validation across time, longitudinal criterion-related validity, temporal nomological validity | LMI, longitudinal invariance, measurement equivalence across time, temporal measurement invariance |
| Saistītās≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Longitudinal nomological validity evaluates whether a construct's theoretically predicted relationships with other constructs hold consistently across multiple measurement occasions. It extends the nomological network framework of Cronbach and Meehl (1955) to longitudinal designs, testing whether a scale behaves as theory demands not only at a single time point but over time. | Longitudinal measurement invariance testing determines whether a psychological scale measures the same construct in the same way across two or more time points. It is a prerequisite for interpreting mean-level change scores in panel and repeated-measures studies, ensuring that observed change reflects true change in the construct rather than drift in the measurement instrument. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|