Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Pēctecīgā dzīvesstāstu pētniecība× | Vēsture mutvārdu avotos× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Kvalitatīvās metodes | Kvalitatīvās metodes |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1918 (origins); longitudinal application developed from 1980s onward | 1948 (modern disciplinary form); broader roots in 19th-century folklore and anthropology |
| Autors≠ | Thomas & Znaniecki (Polish Peasant, 1918–1920); elaborated by Ken Plummer, Daniel Bertaux | Allan Nevins (Columbia University Oral History Project, 1948); earlier roots in folk-life and anthropological fieldwork |
| Tips≠ | Qualitative longitudinal research design | Qualitative research method |
| Pirmavots≠ | Plummer, K. (2001). Documents of Life 2: An Invitation to a Critical Humanism. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761952244 | Ritchie, D. A. (2003). Doing Oral History: A Practical Guide (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195176957 |
| Citi nosaukumi | longitudinal biographical research, life history longitudinal design, repeated life history study, longitudinal oral biography | life history interview, oral testimony, spoken history, oral narrative research |
| Saistītās | 6 | 6 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Longitudinal life history research follows the same participants across multiple points in time, collecting repeated in-depth accounts of how their life stories evolve, how they narrate past events differently over time, and how biography intersects with social change. It combines the interpretive depth of life history methodology with the temporal sensitivity of longitudinal design, capturing both the content of lived experience and its unfolding across the life course. | Oral history is a qualitative research method that collects, preserves, and interprets first-person spoken accounts of past events, experiences, and social processes. By recording in-depth interviews with individuals who witnessed or participated in historical events, oral historians document perspectives that written records often exclude. The method bridges historical scholarship and social science, treating the narrator's memory, subjectivity, and voice as primary evidence rather than as limitations to be corrected. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|