Salīdzināt metodes

	Hronoloģiskās konstruktās validitātes	Testēšana uz mērījumu ekvivalenci
Nozare	Psihometrija	Psihometrija
Saime	Latent structure	Latent structure
Izcelsmes gads	1993–2000	2000
Autors	Meredith, Vandenberg, and the measurement invariance tradition	Vandenberg & Lance
Tips	Validity evaluation framework	Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis procedure
Pirmavots	Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70.	Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70.
Citi nosaukumi	longitudinal measurement validity, construct validity over time, longitudinal measurement invariance, LCV	Factorial Invariance, Measurement Equivalence, Configural-Metric-Scalar Testing, Ölçüm Değişmezliği
Saistītās	5	3
Kopsavilkums	Longitudinal construct validity evaluates whether a psychological scale measures the same latent construct in the same way across multiple time points. It is tested by progressively constraining a confirmatory factor model across waves and comparing model fit, ensuring that observed change scores reflect genuine change in the underlying trait rather than measurement drift.	Measurement invariance testing is a sequence of nested confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models that examines whether a psychological scale measures the same latent construct in the same way across distinct groups or time points. Systematized and popularized by Vandenberg and Lance (2000), the procedure tests a hierarchy of constraints — from identical factor patterns to identical item intercepts — so that researchers can justify meaningful group comparisons on latent means.