Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Logic Model× | Program Evaluation in Social Work× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Social Work | Social Work |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads | 2004 | 2004 |
| Autors≠ | Program-evaluation tradition; popularized by the W. K. Kellogg Foundation | Evaluation-research tradition (Rossi, Lipsey, Freeman); social-work application by Royse, Thyer & Padgett |
| Tips≠ | Diagram linking program resources and activities to intended outcomes | Systematic assessment of the need, design, implementation, and outcomes of a program |
| Pirmavots≠ | W. K. Kellogg Foundation. (2004). Logic Model Development Guide. W. K. Kellogg Foundation. link ↗ | Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (7th ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 9780761908944 |
| Citi nosaukumi | Program Logic Model, Logical Framework, Program Theory Model, Logic Model (Social Work) | Social Program Evaluation, Human Services Program Evaluation, Outcome and Process Evaluation, Evaluation Research (Social Work) |
| Saistītās | 4 | 4 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | A logic model is a diagram that lays out the intended logic of a program — how its resources and activities are expected to produce outputs and, through them, short-, intermediate-, and long-term outcomes. Popularized in human services by the W. K. Kellogg Foundation's development guide, it makes a program's underlying theory of change explicit and testable, providing the backbone for program planning, communication with stakeholders, and evaluation by clarifying exactly what the program does and what it is supposed to achieve. | Program evaluation in social work is the systematic application of social-science methods to judge a program's need, design, implementation, outcomes, and efficiency, in order to improve programs and inform decisions about them. Drawing on the evaluation-research tradition of Rossi, Lipsey, and Freeman and adapted for social work by Royse, Thyer, and Padgett, it spans a hierarchy of evaluation questions — from whether a program is needed and well-conceived to whether it is delivered as intended, produces the intended outcomes, and is worth its cost. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|