Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Lingvistiskā etnogrāfija× | Discourse Analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare≠ | Valodniecība | Kvalitatīvie pētījumi |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1998 | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| Autors≠ | Ben Rampton | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| Tips≠ | Empirical process pipeline | Method |
| Pirmavots≠ | Rampton, B. (2007). Neo-Hymesian linguistic ethnography in the United Kingdom. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(5), 584-607. DOI ↗ | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | Ethnographic Linguistics, Sociolinguistic Ethnography | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| Saistītās | 2 | 2 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Linguistic Ethnography is a qualitative research approach combining ethnographic fieldwork with detailed linguistic analysis to understand language use in cultural context. Developed by researchers like Ben Rampton, it examines how people use language within communities, institutions, and social interactions while paying attention to identity, power, and meaning-making. This method integrates sociolinguistics, anthropology, and discourse analysis to produce rich, contextualized understandings of language-in-society. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|