Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Diagrammas pacēlums un ieguvums× | Precīzijas un atsaukuma AUC× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Modeļu novērtēšana | Modeļu novērtēšana |
| Saime | MCDM | MCDM |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1990s | 2006 |
| Autors≠ | Data mining and marketing analytics | Davis and Goadrich |
| Tips≠ | Evaluation visualization | Evaluation metric |
| Pirmavots≠ | Maimon, O. Z., & Rokach, L. (Eds.). (2010). Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook (2nd ed.). Springer. DOI ↗ | Davis, J., & Goadrich, M. (2006). The relationship between precision-recall and ROC curves. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning, 233-240. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | Cumulative Gain Chart, Lift Curve | PR AUC, PR Curve |
| Saistītās≠ | 2 | 4 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Lift and gain charts visualize classifier performance by showing how much better the model performs compared to random selection, particularly useful for ranking or scoring tasks where you select a top percentage of samples. They are widely used in marketing, credit scoring, and fraud detection. | The Precision-Recall Area Under the Curve (PR AUC) is the area under the curve formed by plotting recall on the x-axis and precision on the y-axis. It is particularly useful for evaluating classifiers on imbalanced datasets, where it is often more informative than ROC AUC. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|