Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| LSI-R: Level of Service Inventory-Revised (Servitūtes līmeņa inventāra× | SAPROF: Strukturēta aizsargfaktoru novērtēšana vardarbības riska gadījumā× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Tiesu psiholoģija | Tiesu psiholoģija |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1995 | 2012 |
| Autors≠ | D. A. Andrews, James Bonta | Vivienne de Vogel, Corine de Ruiter, Yvonne Bouman, Merike de Vries Robbé |
| Tips≠ | Interview-based / File-based | Clinician-rated |
| Pirmavots≠ | Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1995). The Level of Service Inventory-Revised. Department of Psychology, Carleton University. link ↗ | de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., Bouman, Y., & de Vries Robbé, M. (2012). SAPROF: Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (Version 3). Forum Educatief. link ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | LSI-R, LSI-R-SV, Andrews-Bonta Risk Assessment | SAPROF, de Vogel SAPROF |
| Saistītās | 4 | 4 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | The Level of Service Inventory-Revised (LSI-R) is a 54-item assessment instrument developed by Andrews and Bonta (1995) to measure offender risk level and criminogenic needs (dynamic risk factors related to criminal behavior) in criminal justice populations. It is grounded in the Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) model of offender rehabilitation and is widely used in correctional facilities, probation/parole services, and forensic settings to inform release decisions, supervision intensity, treatment prioritization, and rehabilitation planning. | The Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for Violence Risk (SAPROF) is a 17-item structured professional judgment tool developed by de Vogel, de Ruiter, Bouman, and colleagues (2012) to identify protective factors and strengths in individuals undergoing violence risk assessment. It complements risk assessment instruments (e.g., HCR-20v3) by systematically evaluating resilience, social support, motivation, and positive functioning—domains that mitigate violence risk and inform rehabilitation potential. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|