Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Interpretatīvā refleksīvā tēmatiskā analīze× | Interpretive Discourse Analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Kvalitatīvās metodes | Kvalitatīvās metodes |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2006 (foundational); interpretivist framing consolidated 2019–2021 | 1980s–1990s |
| Autors≠ | Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke | Rooted in interpretivist social science; systematised by Norman Fairclough, Margaret Wetherell, and others |
| Tips≠ | Qualitative data analysis approach | Qualitative interpretive research approach |
| Pirmavots≠ | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. DOI ↗ | Phillips, N., & Hardy, C. (2002). Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761923343 |
| Citi nosaukumi | Interpretive RTA, reflexive TA (interpretivist), constructivist reflexive thematic analysis, interpretivist thematic analysis | IDA, interpretivist discourse analysis, discourse analysis (interpretive), meaning-focused discourse analysis |
| Saistītās | 6 | 6 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Interpretive Reflexive Thematic Analysis applies Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis framework explicitly within an interpretivist epistemological stance. The analyst treats meaning as co-constructed between researcher and data, foregrounds their own subjective positionality throughout the coding and theming process, and produces theoretically rich accounts of participant perspectives rather than surface-level content summaries. It is among the most widely used analytical approaches in contemporary qualitative research. | Interpretive discourse analysis is a qualitative approach that examines how language constructs social realities, identities, and meanings within specific contexts. Operating from an interpretivist epistemology, it treats texts and talk not as transparent windows onto the world but as active sites where meaning is negotiated, and it seeks to understand those meanings from the perspective of participants situated within their social and cultural worlds. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|