Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Integratīvā apskats× | Ātrā pārskatīšana× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Zinātnometrija | Zinātnometrija |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2005 (updated methodology); roots in Cooper (1982) | 2000s (rapidly adopted after 2005; Cochrane guidance 2020–2021) |
| Autors≠ | Robin Whittemore & Kathleen Knafl | Developed and formalised by health technology assessment agencies and the Cochrane Collaboration |
| Tips≠ | Systematic review method | Evidence synthesis review |
| Pirmavots≠ | Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553. DOI ↗ | Garritty, C., Gartlehner, G., Nussbaumer-Streit, B., King, V. J., Hamel, C., Kamel, C., Affengruber, L., & Stevens, A. (2021). Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 130, 13–22. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | integrative literature review, integrative research review, ILR, integrative synthesis | rapid evidence review, accelerated systematic review, rapid evidence assessment, REA |
| Saistītās≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | An integrative review is a systematic method for synthesising literature that allows the simultaneous inclusion of diverse study designs — experimental, quasi-experimental, and non-experimental — as well as theoretical papers. Unlike the conventional systematic review, which is restricted to controlled trials or a single methodology, the integrative review builds a comprehensive understanding of a phenomenon by drawing on the full breadth of the relevant evidence base. The method follows a rigorous, structured pipeline to ensure transparency and minimise bias. | A rapid review is a streamlined form of systematic review that deliberately simplifies or omits certain steps — such as dual screening, exhaustive grey-literature search, or full risk-of-bias assessment — in order to deliver timely, policy-relevant evidence synthesis within weeks rather than years. It is increasingly used by health agencies, governments, and organisations facing urgent decision-making needs where a full systematic review is not feasible within the available time and resources. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|