Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Integratīvās Medicīnas Attieksmes Aptauja× | Attitudes toward Complementary and Alternative Medicine Scale× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Integratīvā medicīna | Integratīvā medicīna |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2005 | 2003 |
| Autors≠ | Bikker, A. P.; Merelle, S. B.; Reinders, M. E. | Hough, H. J.; Darcey, V. L.; Scofield, R. F. |
| Tips | Self-report scale | Self-report scale |
| Pirmavots≠ | Bikker, A. P., Merelle, S. B., & Reinders, M. E. (2005). Attitudes towards integrative medicine among healthcare professionals: A cross-sectional survey. Patient Education and Counseling, 56(3), 327–335. link ↗ | Hough, H. J., Darcey, V. L., & Scofield, R. F. (2003). Attitudes toward alternative/complementary medicines among pharmacy students, faculty, and preceptors. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 67(3), 85. link ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | IMAQ | ACAMS |
| Saistītās | 4 | 4 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | The IMAQ is a 26-item self-report instrument assessing healthcare professionals' attitudes toward integrative medicine—the combined use of conventional and complementary therapies based on evidence and patient-centered values. Developed by Bikker and colleagues, it measures five dimensions of attitudes: cognitive, practical, affective, and social aspects of integrative practice. | The ACAMS is a self-report instrument measuring healthcare professionals' and students' attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine. Developed in the early 2000s, it assesses openness, acceptance, and perceived legitimacy of CAM alongside conventional medicine, helping identify educational gaps and organizational readiness for integrative practice. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|