ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Instrumentāls gadījuma pētījums×Darbības izpēte×Teorija saknēs×
NozareKvalitatīvās metodesKvalitatīvie pētījumiKvalitatīvie pētījumi
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads199519461967
AutorsRobert E. StakeKurt Lewin; expanded by Kemmis, McTaggart, Reason & BradburyBarney Glaser and Anselm Strauss
TipsQualitative research methodMethodMethod
PirmavotsStake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0803957671Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. DOI ↗Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. link ↗
Citi nosaukumiinstrumental case research, theory-building case study, illustrative case study, issue-driven case studyParticipatory Action Research, PAR, Collaborative InquiryGT, Grounded Theory Approach
Saistītās613
KopsavilkumsInstrumental case study is a qualitative research design, formalised by Robert E. Stake (1995), in which a specific case is studied primarily to gain insight into an external issue or theoretical question — not because the case itself is intrinsically important. The case serves as an instrument for understanding something broader: a policy problem, a theoretical proposition, or a generalised phenomenon. One or several cases are selected because they are expected to illuminate the issue particularly well, and the researcher moves fluidly between the case and the issue throughout the study.Action research is a collaborative research methodology in which researchers work with practitioners and community members to investigate a problem, implement change, and evaluate outcomes, cycling through reflection, action, and learning. Developed by Kurt Lewin (1946), action research bridges research and practice, aiming simultaneously to produce knowledge and practical improvement.Grounded Theory (GT) is a systematic qualitative research methodology in which theory emerges directly from data through iterative analysis, rather than being imposed before data collection. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, GT prioritizes generating explanatory frameworks grounded in evidence.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 2 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Instrumental Case Study · Action Research · Grounded Theory. Izgūts 2026-06-19 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare