Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Institucionālā uzticēšanās skala× | Vispārīgās uzticības skala× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Politiskā socioloģija | Politiskā socioloģija |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1975–2011 | 1956–1994 |
| Autors≠ | David Easton, Marc Hetherington, Pippa Norris | Morris Rosenberg, Toshio Yamagishi |
| Tips | Self-report questionnaire | Self-report questionnaire |
| Pirmavots≠ | Hetherington, M. J. (2005). Why trust matters: Declining political trust and the demise of American liberalism. Princeton University Press. link ↗ | Rosenberg, M. (1956). Misanthropy, political ideology, and political information. Public Opinion Quarterly, 20(2), 274-290. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | ITS, Institutional Confidence Index | GTS, Trust in Strangers |
| Saistītās≠ | 4 | 5 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | The Institutional Trust Scale measures an individual's confidence and trust in formal political and social institutions including parliament, courts, police, media, and civil service. Distinct from generalized interpersonal trust, institutional trust reflects belief in the legitimacy, fairness, and effectiveness of formal organizations that structure governance and public life. Developed in political science by scholars including David Easton and Marc Hetherington, it is a key indicator of democratic health and governance legitimacy. | The Generalized Trust Scale measures an individual's propensity to trust people in general, particularly strangers with whom they have no direct relationship. Originally developed by Morris Rosenberg in 1956 and later refined by Toshio Yamagishi and colleagues, it has become foundational in research on social capital, civic participation, and intergroup relations. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|