ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Intuicionistisks MABAC paplašinājums×Analytic Hierarchy Process×
NozareLēmumu pieņemšanaLēmumu pieņemšana
SaimeMCDMMCDM
Izcelsmes gads20211980
AutorsLi, Y.Saaty, T. L.
TipsIntuitionistic outranking/ranking — Intuitionistic Fuzzy Number (IFN: μ, ν; μ+ν ≤ 1)Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue)
PirmavotsPamučar, D., & Ćirović, G. (2015). The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC). Expert Systems with Applications, 42(6), 3016-3028. [Canonical MABAC source; cited in place of the retracted Li (2021) intuitionistic-fuzzy MABAC paper, doi:10.1155/2021/5536751.] DOI ↗Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713
Citi nosaukumi
Saistītās88
KopsavilkumsIF-MABAC (Intuitionistic extension of MABAC) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Li, Y. in 2021. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 1 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: IF-MABAC · AHP. Izgūts 2026-06-18 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare