Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Integrēta objektīvo kritēriju svaru noteikšana× | Aditīvās attiecības novērtējums× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Lēmumu pieņemšana | Lēmumu pieņemšana |
| Saime | MCDM | MCDM |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2012 | 2010 |
| Autors≠ | Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. |
| Tips≠ | Integrated objective weighting (ENTROPY × CILOS product-normalisation) | Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row) |
| Pirmavots≠ | Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. (2012). Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making link ↗ | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | — | — |
| Saistītās | 8 | 8 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | IDOCRIW (Integrated Determination of Objective CRIteria Weights) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. in 2012. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|