ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

HF-TOPSIS×Labākā-Sliktākā metode×
NozareLēmumu pieņemšanaLēmumu pieņemšana
SaimeMCDMMCDM
Izcelsmes gads20132015
AutorsXu, Z., Zhang, X.Rezaei, J.
TipsDistance-to-ideal ranking (Hwang-Yoon 1981) extended to Hesitant Fuzzy Elements (HFE ⊂ [0,1]) via the hesitant normalised Euclidean distance d_1 (Xu-Xia 2011b); supports three weight-information modes: fully specified, completely unknown (Eq.(22) maximizing deviation closed-form), and partly known (Model M-2 linear programme).Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP
PirmavotsXu, Z., Zhang, X. (2013). Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information. Knowledge-Based Systems DOI ↗Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗
Citi nosaukumi
Saistītās88
KopsavilkumsHF-TOPSIS (Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS with optional incomplete weight information (Xu-Zhang 2013 KBS)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Xu, Z., Zhang, X. in 2013. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 1 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: HF-TOPSIS · BWM. Izgūts 2026-06-18 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare