Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Heterogēno ārstēšanas efektu divkārši robusta novērtēšana× | Apgrieztā varbūtības svēršana (IPW / IPTW)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Cēloņsakarību secināšana | Cēloņsakarību secināšana |
| Saime | Regression model | Regression model |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2018-2023 | 2000 |
| Autors≠ | Kennedy (2023); building on Robins, Rotnitzky & Zhao (1994) and Chernozhukov et al. (2018) | Robins, Hernán & Brumback |
| Tips≠ | Semiparametric causal inference | Causal inference weighting estimator |
| Pirmavots≠ | Kennedy, E. H. (2023). Towards optimal doubly robust estimation of heterogeneous causal effects. Electronic Journal of Statistics, 17(2), 3008-3049. DOI ↗ | Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | DR-HTE, augmented IPW for HTE, doubly robust CATE estimation, semiparametric HTE estimation | IPW, IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting, marginal structural model weighting |
| Saistītās | 5 | 5 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Doubly robust estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects (HTE) estimates how the causal effect of a treatment varies across subgroups or individual covariate values. By combining an outcome model and a propensity score model, it retains consistency if either model is correctly specified, and supports flexible machine learning nuisance estimators through cross-fitting to produce valid conditional average treatment effect (CATE) estimates. | Inverse Probability Weighting is a causal-inference method that assigns each observation a weight equal to the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received. Introduced by Robins, Hernán and Brumback (2000) for marginal structural models, it builds a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of measured confounders, balancing selection bias. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|