Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Inventārs laba nāve× | Palliative Performance Scale× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Paliatīvā aprūpe | Paliatīvā aprūpe |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2009 | 1996 |
| Autors≠ | Ching and colleagues, Hong Kong | Anderson, Downing, and colleagues |
| Tips≠ | Self-report or proxy (bereaved family) | Clinician-rated |
| Pirmavots≠ | Ching, J. P., Cheng, Z. H., Cheung, K. C., & Leung, K. K. (2009). Development and validation of the Good Death Inventory in Hong Kong. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, 26(1), 56–64. link ↗ | Anderson, F., Downing, G. M., Hill, J., Casorso, L., & Lerch, N. (1996). Palliative Performance Scale: A new tool. J Palliat Care, 12(1), 5–11. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | GDI, Good Death | PPS |
| Saistītās | 5 | 5 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | The Good Death Inventory (GDI) is a 20-item self-report measure assessing the patient's and family's perception of whether the death was 'good'—characterized by pain control, peace, meaningful closure, preparation, maintenance of dignity, and a sense that life was lived fully. Developed by Ching and colleagues in Hong Kong in 2009, the GDI operationalizes the multidimensional concept of a 'good death' into measurable dimensions, enabling clinicians and researchers to understand what makes end-of-life care meaningful and to identify deaths marked by distress or unfinished business. | The Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) is an 11-point clinician-rated functional assessment tool for patients with advanced, life-limiting illness. Developed by Anderson and colleagues in 1996, it measures overall performance status from 100% (normal) to 0% (death), integrating five domains of functional decline. The PPS is widely used in palliative care, hospice, and oncology settings to guide treatment intensity, prognostication, and care planning. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|