ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Ģeometriskā morfometrija×Identificēto eksemplāru skaits×
NozareArheoloģijaArheoloģija
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads19911971
AutorsFred BooksteinR. E. Chaplin
TipsShape and form analysisFaunal quantification method
PirmavotsBookstein, F. L. (1991). Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge University Press. DOI ↗Chaplin, R. E. (1971). The Study of Animal Bones from Archaeological Sites. Seminar Press. link ↗
Citi nosaukumishape analysis, morphometric analysisNISP method, specimen count
Saistītās44
KopsavilkumsGeometric morphometrics is a quantitative analytical method that captures, analyzes, and compares the shapes of biological structures (bones, teeth, pottery) using coordinate data from landmarks and outlines. Developed by Fred Bookstein in the 1990s, GMM provides a rigorous statistical framework for studying shape variation across populations or time periods. The method allows archaeologists to quantify morphological differences between individuals, populations, or artifact classes with precision impossible using traditional linear measurements.Number of identified specimens (NISP) is a fundamental zooarchaeological method that quantifies the abundance of faunal remains by counting all identifiable bone fragments or specimens in an assemblage. Formalized by R. E. Chaplin and later refined by Donald Grayson and others, NISP is the most straightforward and widely used quantification metric in zooarchaeology. Despite its simplicity, NISP is sensitive to both cultural and taphonomic factors that affect preservation, fragmentation, and identification of bone assemblages.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 3 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Geometric Morphometrics · Number of Identified Specimens. Izgūts 2026-06-20 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare