Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Fuzzy COPRAS× | Kopējā proporcionālā novērtēšana× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Lēmumu pieņemšana | Lēmumu pieņemšana |
| Saime | MCDM | MCDM |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2000 | 1996 |
| Autors≠ | Chen, C. T. | Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. |
| Tips≠ | Fuzzy outranking/ranking — Triangular Fuzzy Number (TFN: l, m, u) | Proportional assessment (benefit/cost split) |
| Pirmavots≠ | Chen, C. T. (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems DOI ↗ | Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | — | — |
| Saistītās≠ | 2 | 8 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | FUZZY-COPRAS (Fuzzy COPRAS — Fuzzy extension of COPRAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Chen, C. T. in 2000. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|