Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| FACIT-Garīgās labklājības skala (FACIT-Sp)× | Sistēmas ticējumu inventārs (SBI)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Reliģijas psiholoģija | Reliģijas psiholoģija |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2002 | 2011 |
| Autors≠ | Amy H. Peterman, George Fitchett, Mark J. Brady, Lisette Hernandez, & David Cella | James M. Holland, Jill M. Currier, & Robert A. Neimeyer |
| Tips | Self-report | Self-report |
| Pirmavots≠ | Peterman, A. H., Fitchett, G., Brady, M. J., Hernandez, L., & Cella, D. (2002). Measuring spiritual well-being in people with cancer: The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Spiritual Well-Being Scale. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24(1), 49–58. DOI ↗ | Holland, J. M., Currier, J. M., & Neimeyer, R. A. (2011). The Systems of Belief Inventory: Factor structure and association with psychosocial outcome in bereavement. Psychological Assessment, 23(2), 311–321. link ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | FACIT-Sp, FACIT-Spiritual | SBI, SBI-15 |
| Saistītās | 4 | 4 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | The FACIT-Sp, developed by Peterman and colleagues in 2002, is a 12-item self-report measure of spiritual well-being specifically designed for people with serious illness, particularly cancer. It assesses two dimensions: meaning and peace (the sense that life has purpose and harmony despite illness) and faith (spiritual or religious trust). Part of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) suite, the FACIT-Sp has become a standard measure in oncology research and palliative care, predicting quality of life, treatment outcomes, and psychological well-being in medical populations. | The Systems of Belief Inventory (SBI), developed by Holland, Currier, and Neimeyer in 2011, is a 15-item self-report measure designed to assess the coherence, flexibility, and adaptive function of an individual's worldview and meaning-making system. Originally validated in bereavement research, the SBI captures dimensions of spiritual and existential belief that predict psychological adjustment following loss or trauma. It measures three key aspects: existential meaning-making, negative religious coping, and hope. The scale is useful in grief counseling, trauma recovery, and any clinical context where worldview disruption occurs. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|