Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Teksta biežuma analīze× | Leksikālā daudzveidība× | Sentimentu analīze× | TF-IDF× | Tēmu modelēšana× | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nozare≠ | Teksta ieguve | Teksta ieguve | Teksta ieguve | Teksta ieguve | Dziļā mācīšanās |
| Saime≠ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline | Machine learning |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1949 | — | — | 1988 | 1999–2003 |
| Autors≠ | George K. Zipf (frequency-distribution foundation) | — | — | Salton & Buckley | Hofmann, T. (pLSA, 1999); Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (LDA, 2003) |
| Tips≠ | Descriptive text-mining analysis | Text quantification / lexical richness measurement | NLP text-classification task | Text vectorization / term-weighting scheme | Unsupervised generative probabilistic model |
| Pirmavots≠ | Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. Addison-Wesley. link ↗ | McCarthy, P. M. & Jarvis, S. (2010). MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 381-392. DOI ↗ | Pang, B. & Lee, L. (2008). Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2(1-2), 1-135. DOI ↗ | Salton, G. & Buckley, C. (1988). Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 24(5), 513-523. DOI ↗ | Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993–1022. link ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | word frequency analysis, n-gram frequency analysis, Metin Frekans Analizi | lexical richness, vocabulary richness, Sözcüksel Çeşitlilik Analizi | opinion mining, polarity detection, duygu analizi | term weighting, tf-idf weighting, TF-IDF Vektörizasyonu | Latent Semantic Analysis, probabilistic topic modeling, topic discovery, thematic modeling |
| Saistītās≠ | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Text frequency analysis is a descriptive text-mining method that counts how often words, n-grams, and phrases occur in a corpus to reveal content patterns and dominant themes. It rests on the frequency-distribution insight formalised by George K. Zipf (1949), that a few terms occur very often while most are rare, and it is one of the most basic and widely used entry points into quantitative text analysis. | Lexical diversity analysis quantifies how varied the vocabulary of a text is — how rich an author's word choice is — using measures such as the type-token ratio (TTR), MTLD, vocd-D, and Yule's K. The MTLD and vocd-D measures were validated by McCarthy and Jarvis (2010), building on earlier work by Tweedie and Baayen (1998) on the stability of lexical-richness measures. | Sentiment analysis, also called opinion mining, is a natural-language-processing task that detects the emotional tone of text — typically classifying it as positive, negative, or neutral. It turns unstructured opinion text into structured, quantifiable polarity signals using one of three families of approaches: sentiment lexicons, trained machine-learning classifiers, or pretrained transformer models. | TF-IDF, introduced by Salton and Buckley (1988), is a term-weighting scheme that scores each word in a document by how often it appears there and how rare it is across the whole collection. It turns raw text into weighted document vectors, giving high weight to terms that are frequent in one document but uncommon elsewhere. | Topic Modeling is a family of unsupervised probabilistic techniques for discovering latent thematic structure in large text collections. By learning which words tend to co-occur, models such as Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) automatically surface coherent topics — each represented as a distribution over vocabulary — without requiring labelled data. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|
|
|
|