Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Lauka piezīmes× | Pētījuma dienasgrāmata× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Aptauju metodoloģija | Aptauju metodoloģija |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | Late 19th century (formalized in 20th century) | 1981 (methodological codification); diary use in research dates to 19th-century anthropology |
| Autors≠ | Rooted in 19th-century anthropology and sociology; systematized by ethnographers such as Bronislaw Malinowski and later Robert Emerson et al. | Robert G. Burgess (systematic methodological treatment) |
| Tips≠ | Qualitative data collection and recording technique | Qualitative data collection and reflexivity tool |
| Pirmavots≠ | Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226206813 | Burgess, R. G. (1981). Keeping a research diary. Cambridge Journal of Education, 11(1), 75–83. link ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | fieldnotes, observational notes, ethnographic notes, jottings | researcher diary, field diary, research journal, reflexive diary |
| Saistītās | 6 | 6 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Field notes are detailed written records created by researchers during or immediately after direct observation in a naturalistic setting. They capture what is seen, heard, and experienced — including behaviors, interactions, physical environments, and the researcher's own analytic impressions — forming the primary data source for ethnographic and observational studies. | A research diary is a systematic, dated log maintained by the researcher throughout a study to record methodological decisions, emergent observations, analytical hunches, and reflections on researcher positionality. Unlike a participant diary, it is authored by the researcher and functions simultaneously as a data source, an audit trail, and a reflexivity instrument. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|