Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Uz lauka balstīta refleksīvā tematiskā analīze× | Tematiskā analīze× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare≠ | Kvalitatīvās metodes | Kvalitatīvie pētījumi |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2019–2021 (RTA formalised); field application concurrent | 2006 |
| Autors≠ | Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke (RTA foundation); applied to field settings via ethnographic traditions | Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke |
| Tips≠ | Qualitative analysis approach | Method |
| Pirmavots≠ | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. Sage. ISBN: 9781473953932 | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | field RTA, ethnographic reflexive thematic analysis, naturalistic RTA, field-based RTA | TA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis |
| Saistītās≠ | 5 | 3 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Field-based Reflexive Thematic Analysis (field RTA) integrates ethnographic data collection — participant observation, field notes, and naturalistic interviews — with the epistemologically explicit, researcher-centred analytic framework of Braun and Clarke's Reflexive Thematic Analysis. It is used when themes must be grounded in observed social practice rather than retrospective accounts alone, placing the researcher's active, documented reflexivity at the centre of both data gathering and interpretation. | Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|