Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Uz lauka balstīta refleksīvā tematiskā analīze× | Teorija saknēs× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare≠ | Kvalitatīvās metodes | Kvalitatīvie pētījumi |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2019–2021 (RTA formalised); field application concurrent | 1967 |
| Autors≠ | Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke (RTA foundation); applied to field settings via ethnographic traditions | Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss |
| Tips≠ | Qualitative analysis approach | Method |
| Pirmavots≠ | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. Sage. ISBN: 9781473953932 | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. link ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi≠ | field RTA, ethnographic reflexive thematic analysis, naturalistic RTA, field-based RTA | GT, Grounded Theory Approach |
| Saistītās≠ | 5 | 3 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Field-based Reflexive Thematic Analysis (field RTA) integrates ethnographic data collection — participant observation, field notes, and naturalistic interviews — with the epistemologically explicit, researcher-centred analytic framework of Braun and Clarke's Reflexive Thematic Analysis. It is used when themes must be grounded in observed social practice rather than retrospective accounts alone, placing the researcher's active, documented reflexivity at the centre of both data gathering and interpretation. | Grounded Theory (GT) is a systematic qualitative research methodology in which theory emerges directly from data through iterative analysis, rather than being imposed before data collection. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, GT prioritizes generating explanatory frameworks grounded in evidence. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|