Salīdzināt metodes

	Skaidrojamas teikumu ietveres	Skaidrojams Transformeris
Nozare	Dziļā mācīšanās	Dziļā mācīšanās
Saime	Machine learning	Machine learning
Izcelsmes gads	2016–2018	2017–2021
Autors	Conneau et al.; Ribeiro et al. (probing + LIME frameworks)	Vaswani et al. (Transformer); explainability extensions by Chefer et al. and the broader XAI community
Tips	Post-hoc interpretability applied to sentence encoders	Interpretable deep learning model
Pirmavots	Conneau, A., Kruszewski, G., Lample, G., Barrault, L., & Baroni, M. (2018). What you can cram into a single $\vec{v}$ector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic properties. In Proceedings of ACL 2018, pp. 2126–2136.	Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30.
Citi nosaukumi	interpretable sentence representations, XAI sentence embeddings, probing sentence embeddings, explainable sentence vectors	XAI Transformer, Interpretable Transformer, Transparent Transformer, Explainable Attention Model
Saistītās	6	4
Kopsavilkums	Explainable sentence embeddings combine dense sentence representation learning with post-hoc or intrinsic interpretability tools — such as probing classifiers, LIME, SHAP, or attention attribution — to reveal what linguistic and semantic information is encoded in a sentence vector and why a downstream model makes a given prediction. The goal is to retain the representational power of modern encoders while making their behavior auditable.	An Explainable Transformer combines a standard or pre-trained Transformer architecture with post-hoc or built-in interpretability techniques — such as attention rollout, gradient-weighted attention, or SHAP — to reveal which input tokens or regions drove each prediction. The approach bridges high predictive accuracy with the transparency required in high-stakes or regulated domains.