Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Evidence-Based Practice Process× | Rapid Assessment Instrument× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Social Work | Social Work |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1996 | 2002 |
| Autors≠ | Evidence-based medicine tradition (Sackett et al.); translated to social work by Gambrill and others | Walter W. Hudson and the clinical-measurement tradition; codified by Springer, Abell & Hudson |
| Tips≠ | Structured process for integrating evidence, expertise, and client values in practice decisions | Brief, standardized, self-report measure for repeated use in practice |
| Pirmavots≠ | Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M. C., Gray, J. A. M., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. BMJ, 312(7023), 71–72. DOI ↗ | Springer, D. W., Abell, N., & Hudson, W. W. (2002). Creating and validating rapid assessment instruments for practice and research: Part 1. Research on Social Work Practice, 12(3), 408–439. DOI ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | EBP Process, Evidence-Based Practice (Process Model), Five-Step EBP Process, Evidence-Informed Practice Process | RAI, Rapid Assessment Instruments, Brief Standardized Self-Report Scale, Clinical Measurement Package Scales |
| Saistītās | 4 | 4 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | The evidence-based practice (EBP) process is a structured, five-step way of making practice decisions by integrating the best available research evidence with professional expertise and the client's values and circumstances. Originating in evidence-based medicine as defined by Sackett and colleagues and translated into social work by Eileen Gambrill and others, it reframes EBP not as a fixed list of approved programs but as a transparent decision process — ask, acquire, appraise, apply, assess — that an individual practitioner carries out with and for a particular client. | A rapid assessment instrument (RAI) is a short, standardized, self-report measure designed to be completed quickly and repeatedly so that a social worker can assess the magnitude of a client's problem, compare it against a validated clinical cutoff, and monitor change over the course of an intervention. The format was championed by Walter Hudson, whose Clinical Measurement Package scales set the template, and was systematized for practitioners by Springer, Abell, and Hudson, who laid out how to create and validate such instruments for practice and research. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|