Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Novērtējumu fokusēts daudzfāžu jauktu metožu dizains× | Intervention Mixed Methods Design× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Pētījuma dizains | Pētījuma dizains |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 2007–2009 (multiphase design formalized 2007; evaluation-focused applications consolidated ca. 2009) | 2000s–2010s (systematised in Creswell & Plano Clark, 2011–2018) |
| Autors≠ | John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark (multiphase design); Stewart I. Donaldson and colleagues (evaluation-focused framing) | John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark |
| Tips≠ | Mixed methods research design — program evaluation variant | Mixed methods research design |
| Pirmavots≠ | Donaldson, S. I., Christie, C. A., & Mark, M. M. (Eds.). (2009). What Counts as Credible Evidence in Applied Research and Evaluation Practice? Sage. ISBN: 978-1412957090 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 |
| Citi nosaukumi | evaluation multiphase mixed methods, program evaluation multiphase design, mixed methods program evaluation, evaluative multiphase design | intervention MMR design, mixed methods intervention study, intervention-embedded mixed design, trial-embedded mixed methods |
| Saistītās | 6 | 6 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | The evaluation-focused multiphase mixed methods design applies the multiphase mixed methods framework explicitly to program evaluation contexts, orchestrating three or more sequential or iterative phases — each drawing on quantitative measures, qualitative inquiry, or both — to assess a program, policy, or intervention from needs assessment through impact evaluation. An overarching evaluation question unifies all phases, and findings from each phase directly shape the evaluation questions and methods of the next. | Intervention mixed methods design embeds qualitative data collection within an experimental or quasi-experimental study so that process, mechanism, and participant experience are captured alongside outcome measurement. The quantitative strand tests whether the intervention works; the qualitative strand explains how and why it works — or does not. The two strands may be sequenced before, during, or after the intervention phase, or run concurrently, depending on the research questions. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|