Salīdzināt metodes

	Novērtējumu fokusēts izpētes secīgs jauktu metožu dizains	Transformējošā jauktās metodes dizains
Nozare	Pētījuma dizains	Pētījuma dizains
Saime	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Izcelsmes gads	2000s–2010s	2003–2009
Autors	John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark (exploratory sequential base); Jennifer C. Greene & Donna M. Mertens (evaluation framing)	Donna M. Mertens; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark
Tips	Mixed methods research design	Mixed methods research design
Pirmavots	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379
Citi nosaukumi	evaluative exploratory sequential MMR, exploratory sequential evaluation design, QUAL→QUAN evaluation mixed methods	transformative design, advocacy mixed methods, emancipatory mixed methods, social-justice mixed methods
Saistītās	6	6
Kopsavilkums	The evaluation-focused exploratory sequential mixed methods design combines program evaluation goals with a two-phase sequential structure: qualitative inquiry precedes and informs a quantitative phase. Phase 1 explores stakeholder experiences or program processes through interviews or focus groups; the findings build an instrument or framework used to measure outcomes quantitatively in Phase 2. The approach is used when little is known about a program's mechanisms, and both understanding and generalizing findings to a wider population matter.	Transformative mixed methods design embeds a social-justice or advocacy theoretical framework — such as feminism, critical race theory, disability studies, or indigenous worldviews — as the overarching lens that guides every decision about data collection, integration, and use. Both quantitative and qualitative strands serve the goal of advancing equity, challenging power structures, and producing actionable knowledge for marginalized communities.