ScholarGate
Asistents

Salīdzināt metodes

Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.

Etnogrāfija×Dalībnieku pārbaude un respondentu validācija×Jaukto metožu pētniecība×
NozareKvalitatīvās metodesKvalitatīvie pētījumiKvalitatīvās metodes
SaimeProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Izcelsmes gadsc. 1922 (Malinowski's Argonauts of the Western Pacific)1985
AutorsBronisław Malinowski (modern ethnography); rooted in 19th-century anthropologyYvonna Lincoln and Egon Guba
TipsQualitative fieldwork traditionMethodResearch design framework
PirmavotsHammersley, M. & Atkinson, P. (2019). Ethnography: Principles in Practice (4th ed.). Routledge. ISBN: 978-1138504462Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0803924314Creswell, J.W. & Plano Clark, V.L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379
Citi nosaukumiEtnografi, participant observation, fieldwork, ethnographic researchmember validation, respondent validation, participant feedback, credibility checkKarma Yöntem Araştırması (Mixed Methods), multi-method research, triangulation design
Saistītās544
KopsavilkumsEthnography is a qualitative research tradition in which a researcher immerses themselves in a social group or community over an extended period — typically three to six months or longer — to study its culture, values, and behaviours in their natural setting. Originating in social and cultural anthropology, and consolidated as a rigorous method by Bronisław Malinowski in the early twentieth century, ethnography produces rich, contextualised accounts of how people live, work, and make meaning together.Member checking is a quality assurance procedure in qualitative research in which the researcher shares preliminary findings, interpretations, or analytical themes with research participants and asks whether the findings accurately reflect their perspectives and experiences. Developed by Lincoln and Guba (1985) as a trustworthiness criterion, member checking is considered a key method for ensuring credibility and reducing researcher misinterpretation. The goal is to verify that the researcher has understood participants correctly and that interpretations are grounded in participants' actual meaning-making, not the researcher's assumptions. Member checking can occur at different points in research (after individual interviews, after initial analysis, or after draft findings are written) and take different forms (individual feedback, group validation, interactive discussion).Mixed methods research is a systematic research design in which quantitative and qualitative data are collected and analysed within a single study. Formalised by Creswell and Plano Clark (2003, 3rd ed. 2018), it offers three principal design variants — concurrent, sequential, and transformative — and strengthens findings through triangulation across both data strands.
ScholarGateDatu kopa
  1. v1
  2. 1 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Avoti
  3. PUBLISHED

Doties uz meklēšanu Lejupielādēt slaidus

ScholarGateSalīdzināt metodes: Ethnography · Member Checking and Respondent Validation · Mixed Methods Research. Izgūts 2026-06-19 no https://scholargate.app/lv/compare