Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Mērogs vides problēmu uztraukumam× | Klimata pārmaiņu attieksmes skala× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Vides psiholoģija | Vides psiholoģija |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1978 | 2019 |
| Autors≠ | Russell H. Weigel and Jeanette Weigel | Hui Li, Marianne C. Monroe |
| Tips≠ | Self-report Likert scale | Self-report belief and attitude scale |
| Pirmavots≠ | Weigel, R. H., & Weigel, J. (1978). Environmental concern: The development of a measure. Environment and Behavior, 10(1), 3–15. DOI ↗ | Li, H., & Monroe, M. C. (2019). Development and validation of the Climate Change Attitude Scale (CCAS). Climatic Change, 152(3–4), 601–613. link ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | ECS, Environmental Attitudes Inventory | CCAS, Climate Attitude Scale |
| Saistītās≠ | 3 | 4 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | The Environmental Concern Scale (ECS) measures the degree to which individuals worry about and feel affected by environmental problems, pollution, and ecological degradation. Originally developed by Weigel and Weigel (1978), the ECS focuses on emotional and affective responses to environmental issues—anxiety, worry, and perceived personal threat from pollution—rather than abstract values or beliefs. The scale is widely used in public opinion research, conservation communication effectiveness studies, and assessing emotional responses to environmental threats like climate change and air pollution. | The Climate Change Attitude Scale (CCAS) measures individuals' beliefs about climate change causation, severity, and human responsibility, as well as attitudes toward climate action and climate policy. Developed by Li and Monroe (2019) as an extension of general environmental attitude scales, the CCAS focuses specifically on climate change perceptions—whether individuals believe climate change is real, anthropogenic (human-caused), severe, and actionable. The scale is essential for tracking public opinion on climate, identifying populations skeptical of climate science, evaluating climate communication campaign effectiveness, and examining links between climate beliefs and policy support or climate action. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|