Salīdzināt metodes
Apskatiet izvēlētās metodes blakus; rindas, kas atšķiras, ir izceltas.
| Ekosistēmu pakalpojumu novērtēšana× | DPSIR Framework× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nozare | Ilgtspēja | Ilgtspēja |
| Saime | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Izcelsmes gads≠ | 1997 | 1993 |
| Autors≠ | Robert Costanza, Rudolf de Groot, and team | OECD, refined by European Environment Agency |
| Tips≠ | Valuation method | Diagnostic framework |
| Pirmavots≠ | Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farberk, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., ... & van den Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(6630), 253-260. DOI ↗ | European Environment Agency (1999). Environmental Indicators: Typology and Overview. EEA Technical Report No. 25. Copenhagen: EEA. link ↗ |
| Citi nosaukumi | ESV, Natural capital accounting, Environmental valuation | DPSIR, PSR, Pressure-State-Response |
| Saistītās | 3 | 3 |
| Kopsavilkums≠ | Ecosystem Services Valuation (ESV) is a framework pioneered by Costanza and colleagues (1997) that assigns economic value to the benefits nature provides to humanity—from pollination and water purification to climate regulation and cultural enjoyment. Formalized in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) and The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB 2010), ESV bridges ecology and economics to make the invisible value of ecosystems visible to policymakers and markets. | The DPSIR Framework (Driving force, Pressure, State, Impact, Response) is a diagnostic and policy tool developed by the OECD (1993) and refined by the European Environment Agency (1999) to structure environmental and sustainability problems. It organizes causal relationships from economic activity through to policy interventions, enabling governments and organizations to identify where to intervene for environmental improvement. |
| ScholarGateDatu kopa ↗ |
|
|